MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11701-018-0852-z

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of robotic surgery · 2018

Simulated management of urinary tract injury during robotic pelvic surgery utilizing the porcine model.

Hoffman Mitchel S, Spiess Philippe E

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Urologic injury is an infrequent but serious complication of pelvic surgery. Training in the assessment and management of this injury might be enhanced through animated simulation. Our objective was to assess the intraoperative management of urologic injury with robotic pelvic surgery using a simulated injury animal model. We used a female domestic pig to create three types of urologic injury, which we then managed with robotically assisted surgery. An edited video of the model was assessed by 14 senior learners and 10 attending faculty. The assessments included key competencies and domains of fidelity. A scale of poor, fair, or good was utilized. The defects and repairs simulated those seen in humans, both anatomically and surgically, although deficiencies were noted. Related to fidelity of the anatomy of the ureter and bladder, lower ratings were given for some of the key competencies (determining the relationship to the trigone, ureteral mobilization, repair of all 3 injuries). The porcine model for simulation of urologic injury during robotically assisted pelvic surgery may be useful for training purposes.

Для цитирования: Hoffman Mitchel S, Spiess Philippe E. Simulated management of urinary tract injury during robotic pelvic surgery utilizing the porcine model.. Journal of robotic surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0852-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.