European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma and the influence of the learning curve.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garcia-Iza Leire, Guisasola Amaia, Ugarte Ane, Navarro Juan Jose, Goiburu Miren, Altuna Xabier
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness and reliability of this technique in our center, correlating the radiological and surgical findings and to study the influence of the learning curve by comparing the initial results with a radiological analysis performed 3 years after.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: 67 patients with clinical cholesteatoma suspicion were included in the study, 24 with previously not operated cholesteatoma and 43 with suspicion of recurrent or residual cholesteatoma. All of them underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, comparing these results with the histological confirmation after surgery. At 3 years, a blind radiological review of these cases was performed and the results were compared with those obtained after the first assessment to objectify the influence of the learning curve.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the total sample were 93.9, 77.8, 92 and 82.4. The overall results after the blind review of the cases were 95.9, 94.4, 97.9 and 89.5, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a very useful technique during the diagnostic process of doubtful cases of cholesteatoma, especially in cases of follow-up. As for the influence of the learning curve, we observed a clear improvement in the specificity of the test.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: 67 patients with clinical cholesteatoma suspicion were included in the study, 24 with previously not operated cholesteatoma and 43 with suspicion of recurrent or residual cholesteatoma. All of them underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, comparing these results with the histological confirmation after surgery. At 3 years, a blind radiological review of these cases was performed and the results were compared with those obtained after the first assessment to objectify the influence of the learning curve.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the total sample were 93.9, 77.8, 92 and 82.4. The overall results after the blind review of the cases were 95.9, 94.4, 97.9 and 89.5, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a very useful technique during the diagnostic process of doubtful cases of cholesteatoma, especially in cases of follow-up. As for the influence of the learning curve, we observed a clear improvement in the specificity of the test.