Head & neck · 2017
Intraoperative image guidance in transoral robotic surgery: A pilot study.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ma Andrew K, Daly Michael, Qiu Jimmy, Chan Harley H L, Goldstein David P, Irish Jonathan C, de Almeida John R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative image guidance during transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is hampered by imaging-friendly instrumentation and intraoperative positioning. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an accurate image-guidance system for TORS.
METHODS: A custom radiolucent mouth retractor was fabricated from biocompatible material (Med-610; Stratasys, Minneapolis, MN). Teflon beads were placed in the oropharynx and carotid arteries of 3 cadavers. CT scans were obtained in the preoperative and intraoperative positions. Displacement of targets between preoperative and intraoperative scans was measured. Surgical navigation was based on the open-source Image-Guided Surgery Toolkit. Target registration error (TRE) was determined by measuring the distance between the tracker and bead registered to preoperative versus intraoperative scans.
RESULTS: The inferior oropharyngeal targets demonstrated the greatest displacement between positions. A significant reduction in TRE was observed when registering the tracker to the intraoperative compared to the preoperative scan.
CONCLUSION: This study describes an accurate intraoperative image-guidance system for TORS.
METHODS: A custom radiolucent mouth retractor was fabricated from biocompatible material (Med-610; Stratasys, Minneapolis, MN). Teflon beads were placed in the oropharynx and carotid arteries of 3 cadavers. CT scans were obtained in the preoperative and intraoperative positions. Displacement of targets between preoperative and intraoperative scans was measured. Surgical navigation was based on the open-source Image-Guided Surgery Toolkit. Target registration error (TRE) was determined by measuring the distance between the tracker and bead registered to preoperative versus intraoperative scans.
RESULTS: The inferior oropharyngeal targets demonstrated the greatest displacement between positions. A significant reduction in TRE was observed when registering the tracker to the intraoperative compared to the preoperative scan.
CONCLUSION: This study describes an accurate intraoperative image-guidance system for TORS.