MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1293

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014

Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplification and therapy response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic.

Jardim Denis L F, Tang Chad, Gagliato Debora De Melo, Falchook Gerald S, Hess Kenneth, Janku Filip, Fu Siqing, Wheler Jennifer J, Zinner Ralph G, Naing Aung, Tsimberidou Apostolia M, Holla Vijaykumar, Li Marylin M, Roy-Chowdhuri Sinchita, Luthra Raja, Salgia Ravi, Kurzrock Razelle, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Hong David S

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.

EXPERIMENTAL

DESIGN

From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.

RESULTS

Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.

CONCLUSION

MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.

Для цитирования: Jardim Denis L F, Tang Chad, Gagliato Debora De Melo, Falchook Gerald S, Hess Kenneth, Janku Filip, Fu Siqing, Wheler Jennifer J, Zinner Ralph G, Naing Aung, Tsimberidou Apostolia M, Holla Vijaykumar, Li Marylin M, Roy-Chowdhuri Sinchita, Luthra Raja, Salgia Ravi, Kurzrock Razelle, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Hong David S. Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplification and therapy response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic.. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1293.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.