The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 1989
Bonding behavior of a glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite in segmental replacement of the rabbit tibia under load-bearing conditions.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T, Kokubo T
Аннотация
Glass-ceramic implants containing apatite and wollastonite were studied under load-bearing conditions in a segmental replacement model in the tibia of the rabbit. Alumina-ceramic implants were used as a control. A sixteen-millimeter segment of the middle of the shaft of the tibia was resected at a point distal to the junction of the tibia and the fibula. The defect was replaced by a fifteen-millimeter-long hollow, cylindrical implant that was fixed by intramedullary nailing using a Kirschner wire. Two groups of eight rabbits each (one group with a glass-ceramic implant and the other with an alumina implant) were killed twelve weeks after implantation. Two similar groups were killed twenty-five weeks after implantation. The segment of the tibia that contained the implant was excised and tension-tested. The load to failure of glass-ceramic implants containing apatite and wollastonite increased with time. The loads to failure of the glass-ceramic and alumina implants at twelve weeks after implantation were 19.8 +/- 7.06 and zero newtons, respectively. The loads to failure of glass-ceramic and alumina implants at twenty-five weeks after implantation were 126.4 +/- 32.54 and 19.6 +/- 13.92 newtons, respectively. No glass-ceramic implants broke. A calcium-phosphorus layer at the interface of the glass-ceramic and the bone was observed by scanning electron microscopy and electron-probe microanalysis. There was no interposition of soft tissue between the glass-ceramic and the bone, as observed by Giemsa surface staining.