Brachytherapy · 2017
Differences in urethral dosimetry between CT and MR imaging in multichannel vaginal cylinder brachytherapy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Katherine S, Glaser Scott M, Kim Hayeon, Beriwal Sushil
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In image-based brachytherapy (IBBT), the dosimetry of small structures may be particularly sensitive to changes in contouring between imaging modalities. We therefore sought to characterize differences in urethral dosimetry in vaginal brachytherapy based on contouring on MRI vs. CT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified our most recent 15 patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy for distal vaginal malignancies. On T2-weighted MRI, both the lumen and urethral wall were contoured. On CT, the urethral lumen alone was contoured, as the wall is indistinguishable from surrounding tissue. High-dose-rate (HDR) IBBT plans were generated for all patients.
RESULTS: Mean urethral volume was higher on MRI than CT at 3.7 cc vs. 1.1 cc (p < 0.0005). As a result, there were statistically significant increases on MRI in D0.1cc and D0.5cc, as well as EQD2 D0.1cc and EQD2 D0.5cc when applied to a full course of treatment (45 Gy EBRT + 25 Gy IBBT).
CONCLUSIONS: We have quantified the expected differences in urethral volume and dosimetry when contoured on MRI vs. CT. Inclusion of the urethral wall on MRI, with its average thickness of 2.2 mm, likely more accurately reflects the true organ at risk and results in an increase in reported dose compared to CT.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified our most recent 15 patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy for distal vaginal malignancies. On T2-weighted MRI, both the lumen and urethral wall were contoured. On CT, the urethral lumen alone was contoured, as the wall is indistinguishable from surrounding tissue. High-dose-rate (HDR) IBBT plans were generated for all patients.
RESULTS: Mean urethral volume was higher on MRI than CT at 3.7 cc vs. 1.1 cc (p < 0.0005). As a result, there were statistically significant increases on MRI in D0.1cc and D0.5cc, as well as EQD2 D0.1cc and EQD2 D0.5cc when applied to a full course of treatment (45 Gy EBRT + 25 Gy IBBT).
CONCLUSIONS: We have quantified the expected differences in urethral volume and dosimetry when contoured on MRI vs. CT. Inclusion of the urethral wall on MRI, with its average thickness of 2.2 mm, likely more accurately reflects the true organ at risk and results in an increase in reported dose compared to CT.