MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.23.02110

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024

RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Spigel David R, Dowlati Afshin, Chen Yuanbin, Navarro Alejandro, Yang James Chih-Hsin, Stojanovic Goran, Jove Maria, Rich Patricia, Andric Zoran G, Wu Yi-Long, Rudin Charles M, Chen Huanyu, Zhang Li, Yeung Stanley, Benzaghou Fawzi, Paz-Ares Luis, Bunn Paul A, RESILIENT Trial Investigators

СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.

Для цитирования: Spigel David R, Dowlati Afshin, Chen Yuanbin, Navarro Alejandro, Yang James Chih-Hsin, Stojanovic Goran, Jove Maria, Rich Patricia, Andric Zoran G, Wu Yi-Long, Rudin Charles M, Chen Huanyu, Zhang Li, Yeung Stanley, Benzaghou Fawzi, Paz-Ares Luis, Bunn Paul A, RESILIENT Trial Investigators. RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02110.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.