Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2013
Comparison of the clinical performance of restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) and Roche linear array HPV test assays for HPV detection and genotyping.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Hyo-Pyo, Cho Woojae, Bae Jae-Man, Shin Ji Young, Shin Soo-Kyung, Hwang Sun Young, Min Kyung Tae, Kim Soo Nyung, Lee Sun Joo, Kim Soo-Ok, Yoo Wang Don, Hong Sun Pyo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The need for accurate genotyping of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections is becoming increasingly important as HPV is the primary cause of cervical cancer worldwide. The matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) assay provides accurate, broad-spectrum, high-throughput genotyping of HPV.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the clinical performance of the RFMP assay compared to a commercially available Roche linear array HPV genotyping test (LA) for detecting and genotyping of HPV.
STUDY DESIGN: The RFMP assay and the LA were compared for detecting and genotyping HPV among a cohort of 244 liquid-based cytology samples.
RESULTS: Overall, 216 specimens (93.1%, κ = 0.86) generated concordant results for the presence or absence of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) by the two assays. The RFMP assay and the LA assay generated concordant, compatible, and discordant genotyping results for 79.3, 9.9, and 10.8%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RFMP and LA for the cervical lesions of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were similar, at 92.9 and 85.0% (RFMP) and 92.9 and 83.8% (LA), respectively. In addition, the odds ratio for SCC with HR-HPV positivity estimated by the RFMP assay (73.7, 95% CI: 8.9-3173.3) was higher than the LA assay (67.0, 95% CI: 8.2-2887.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The RFMP and the LA assays were highly comparable with regard to detection and genotyping analysis of HPV. The sensitivity and specificity of RFMP assay for the detection of HR-HPV in various levels of cervical lesions seems to be valuable in the monitoring of HPV-associated cervical cancer.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the clinical performance of the RFMP assay compared to a commercially available Roche linear array HPV genotyping test (LA) for detecting and genotyping of HPV.
STUDY DESIGN: The RFMP assay and the LA were compared for detecting and genotyping HPV among a cohort of 244 liquid-based cytology samples.
RESULTS: Overall, 216 specimens (93.1%, κ = 0.86) generated concordant results for the presence or absence of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) by the two assays. The RFMP assay and the LA assay generated concordant, compatible, and discordant genotyping results for 79.3, 9.9, and 10.8%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RFMP and LA for the cervical lesions of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were similar, at 92.9 and 85.0% (RFMP) and 92.9 and 83.8% (LA), respectively. In addition, the odds ratio for SCC with HR-HPV positivity estimated by the RFMP assay (73.7, 95% CI: 8.9-3173.3) was higher than the LA assay (67.0, 95% CI: 8.2-2887.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The RFMP and the LA assays were highly comparable with regard to detection and genotyping analysis of HPV. The sensitivity and specificity of RFMP assay for the detection of HR-HPV in various levels of cervical lesions seems to be valuable in the monitoring of HPV-associated cervical cancer.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Carcinoma, Squamous CellCervix UteriDNA, ViralFemaleGenotypeHuman Papillomavirus DNA TestsHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears