Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica · 2017
[Is there an ideal patient for transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy?].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Siles Hinojosa A, Bragagnini Rodríguez P, González Ruiz Y, Fernández Atuan R, Álvarez García N, Elías Pollina J, Gracia Romero J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that lead to postoperative morbidity in acute appendicitis patients treated using a TULAA (Transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy) approach.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients treated through a TULAA approach between 2007 and 2014. Data concerning the location of the appendix, need for conversion, appendiceal abscess or perforation, surgical time and other complications were collected. Student's T test and Chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 111 appendectomies underwent TULAA. The average operating time was 79 minutes (45-150). Nonperforated appendicitis was found in 90% of patients with 10% having perforated appendicitis or appendiceal abscess. In 35,13% of cases, additional trocars were used, usually when the appendix was in a retrocecal position (89,5%). When the appendix was found in a pelvic or ileal position, a need for extra trocars decreased to 25.9% (p< 0.05). The surgery was converted to open surgery in 6,3% of the cases. The appendix in a retrocecal position had a conversion rate of 20,8% compared to 2,3% of cases with an appendix in a pelvic location (p< 0.05). A total of 3,6% reported postoperative wound infection, possibly caused by perforation of the appendix during extraction (p< 0.05). All the perforated appendixes were considered complicated appendixes.
CONCLUSIONS: The retrocecal location of the appendix is associated with the need to install additional trocars or conversion to open surgery. The TULAA approach is ideal for patients with nonperforated acute appendicitis in a pelvic or ileal location.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients treated through a TULAA approach between 2007 and 2014. Data concerning the location of the appendix, need for conversion, appendiceal abscess or perforation, surgical time and other complications were collected. Student's T test and Chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 111 appendectomies underwent TULAA. The average operating time was 79 minutes (45-150). Nonperforated appendicitis was found in 90% of patients with 10% having perforated appendicitis or appendiceal abscess. In 35,13% of cases, additional trocars were used, usually when the appendix was in a retrocecal position (89,5%). When the appendix was found in a pelvic or ileal position, a need for extra trocars decreased to 25.9% (p< 0.05). The surgery was converted to open surgery in 6,3% of the cases. The appendix in a retrocecal position had a conversion rate of 20,8% compared to 2,3% of cases with an appendix in a pelvic location (p< 0.05). A total of 3,6% reported postoperative wound infection, possibly caused by perforation of the appendix during extraction (p< 0.05). All the perforated appendixes were considered complicated appendixes.
CONCLUSIONS: The retrocecal location of the appendix is associated with the need to install additional trocars or conversion to open surgery. The TULAA approach is ideal for patients with nonperforated acute appendicitis in a pelvic or ileal location.