MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00535-002-1122-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastroenterology · 2003

Poorly controlled ulcerative colitis treated by colectomy during remission induced by extracorporeal leukocyte removal therapy.

Fukunaga Ken, Fukuda Yoshihiro, Sawada Koji, Hori Kazutoshi, Matoba Yoshika, Sagayama Ken, Ohnishi Kunio, Fukui Shin, Shimoyama Takashi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Both monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP) and leukocytapheresis (LCAP) are categorized as extracorporeal leukocyte removal therapies (ECCTs). These therapies have been recognized as efficient adjuncts for patients of steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to consider the adaptation and the limitation of these new therapies from the clinical standpoint based on a case of UC showing strong resistance to high-dose continuous steroid injection therapy. The patient successfully underwent a scheduled colectomy while maintaining remission after applying M-GCAP and LCAP independently. Surgical therapy was chosen because of a deep ulcer in the patient's sigmoid colon, which was assumed to constitute a future risk for perforation. This case suggests that combining ECCT with steroid therapy can maintain such poorly controlled and high-risk UC patients safely for the scheduled colectomy while improving the prognosis by reducing the dosage of steroid efficiently prior to operation.

Для цитирования: Fukunaga Ken, Fukuda Yoshihiro, Sawada Koji, Hori Kazutoshi, Matoba Yoshika, Sagayama Ken, Ohnishi Kunio, Fukui Shin, Shimoyama Takashi. Poorly controlled ulcerative colitis treated by colectomy during remission induced by extracorporeal leukocyte removal therapy.. Journal of gastroenterology. 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-002-1122-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.