The Laryngoscope · 2017
Evaluating speech perception of the MAXUM middle ear implant versus speech perception under inserts.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dyer R Kent, Spearman Michael, Spearman Brian, McCraney Anna
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the speech perception of the Ototronix MAXUM middle ear implant relative to the cochlear potential for speech perception of patients.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study chart review.
METHODS: We performed an evaluation of data from a prospective clinical study of 10 MAXUM patients. Primary outcome measures included comparison of word recognition (WR) scores with MAXUM (WRMAXUM ) versus word recognition under inserts (WRinserts ), and the functional gain improvement for pure-tone average (PTA) (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) and high-frequency pure-tone average (2, 3, and 4 kHz).
RESULTS: Ten ears in 10 adult patients (six female; average age 68.7 years) were included. The average speech perception gap (difference between WRinserts and WRMAXUM ) with MAXUM was -9.2% (range, -26% to 4%). A negative number indicates that WRMAXUM was higher than the WRinserts . The average PTA with MAXUM was 23.1 dB (range, 18.7-30 dB), a 38.0-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 20-53.3 dB). The average high-frequency pure-tone average with MAXUM was 34.4 dB (range, 26-43.3 dB), a 42.8-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 32.3-58.7 dB).
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a significant, very strong correlation was observed between WRinserts and WRMAXUM scores (r = 0.86, P = .001), and a patient's WRinserts score may be used to reasonably predict the word recognition outcomes with MAXUM.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:456-460, 2018.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study chart review.
METHODS: We performed an evaluation of data from a prospective clinical study of 10 MAXUM patients. Primary outcome measures included comparison of word recognition (WR) scores with MAXUM (WRMAXUM ) versus word recognition under inserts (WRinserts ), and the functional gain improvement for pure-tone average (PTA) (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) and high-frequency pure-tone average (2, 3, and 4 kHz).
RESULTS: Ten ears in 10 adult patients (six female; average age 68.7 years) were included. The average speech perception gap (difference between WRinserts and WRMAXUM ) with MAXUM was -9.2% (range, -26% to 4%). A negative number indicates that WRMAXUM was higher than the WRinserts . The average PTA with MAXUM was 23.1 dB (range, 18.7-30 dB), a 38.0-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 20-53.3 dB). The average high-frequency pure-tone average with MAXUM was 34.4 dB (range, 26-43.3 dB), a 42.8-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 32.3-58.7 dB).
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a significant, very strong correlation was observed between WRinserts and WRMAXUM scores (r = 0.86, P = .001), and a patient's WRinserts score may be used to reasonably predict the word recognition outcomes with MAXUM.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:456-460, 2018.