Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2012
Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshioka Izumi, Tanaka Tatsurou, Habu Manabu, Oda Masafumi, Kodama Masaaki, Kokuryo Shinya, Kito Shinji, Wakasugi-Sato Nao, Matsumoto-Takeda Shinobu, Seta Yuji, Fukudome Yuki, Tominaga Kazuhiro, Sakoda Sumio, Morimoto Yasuhiro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) alone for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite.
STUDY DESIGN: The relationship between the mandibular relapse after 1 year and the extent of vertical movement following SSRO alone was investigated for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite and the criteria were determined.
RESULTS: The limitation in SSRO alone was found to be 3-mm vertical movement at the gonion. There was a significant difference in the mandibular relapse between the patients with >3-mm change and <3-mm change.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite, if the vertical movement at the gonion is <3 mm, SSRO alone could be an effective treatment. However, if the movement is >3 mm, SSRO alone should be avoided and bimaxillary osteotomies may be a preferable treatment.
STUDY DESIGN: The relationship between the mandibular relapse after 1 year and the extent of vertical movement following SSRO alone was investigated for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite and the criteria were determined.
RESULTS: The limitation in SSRO alone was found to be 3-mm vertical movement at the gonion. There was a significant difference in the mandibular relapse between the patients with >3-mm change and <3-mm change.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite, if the vertical movement at the gonion is <3 mm, SSRO alone could be an effective treatment. However, if the movement is >3 mm, SSRO alone should be avoided and bimaxillary osteotomies may be a preferable treatment.