Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2012
Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in Class III treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Lira Ana de Lourdes Sá, de Moura Walter Leal, de Barros Vieira José Maurício, Nojima Matilde Gonçalves, Nojima Lincoln Issamu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to study the treatment outcomes and accuracy of the digital prediction using Dolphin Imaging Software and the actual postoperative outcome in subjects presenting Class III malocclusions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maxillary advancement surgery was performed in group 1, and maxillary advancement was combined with mandibular setback surgery in group 2. Predictive cephalometric tracings were made using Dolphin Imaging Software.
RESULTS: Before surgery, the maxillary deficiency was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2, and the mandibular length was significantly greater in group 2. Surgical reductions in mandibular length and angle were significantly greater 12 months after surgery than indicated by the predictive cephalometric tracings.
CONCLUSION: In groups 1 and 2, maxillary advancement surgery was performed in accordance with the Dolphin Imaging Software. The mandibular setback surgery performed was beyond the established plan, but without clinical implications. Mandibular dentoskeletal measurements showed a greater correlation with the profile than the maxillary measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maxillary advancement surgery was performed in group 1, and maxillary advancement was combined with mandibular setback surgery in group 2. Predictive cephalometric tracings were made using Dolphin Imaging Software.
RESULTS: Before surgery, the maxillary deficiency was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2, and the mandibular length was significantly greater in group 2. Surgical reductions in mandibular length and angle were significantly greater 12 months after surgery than indicated by the predictive cephalometric tracings.
CONCLUSION: In groups 1 and 2, maxillary advancement surgery was performed in accordance with the Dolphin Imaging Software. The mandibular setback surgery performed was beyond the established plan, but without clinical implications. Mandibular dentoskeletal measurements showed a greater correlation with the profile than the maxillary measurements.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultCephalometryFaceFacial BonesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForecastingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLipMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIMandibleMaxillaNasal BoneOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresOrthopedic Fixation DevicesOsteotomy, Le FortOsteotomy, Sagittal Split RamusOverbiteSoftwareTreatment OutcomeVertical DimensionYoung Adult