The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2016
The Role of Surgery in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia The Hungarian Experience.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fülöp Vilmos, Szigetvári Iván, Szepesi János, Végh György, Zsirai László, Berkowitz Ross S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To review the role of surgery in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) over the past 38 years in our national trophoblastic disease center.
STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1, 1977, and December 31, 2014, 371 patients with low-risk GTN and 190 patients with high-risk GTN were treated with chemotherapy, surgical interventions, or both. The indications for hysterectomy included excision of large uterine tumor masses, uterine hemorrhage or sepsis, or a drug-resistant uterine focus. Metastases were excised due to the presence of drug-resistant foci or complications of disease such as hemorrhage.
RESULTS: Over the period of 1977-2014 74 hysterectomies, 15 resections of vaginal metastases, 3 omentectomies, 13 adnexectomies, 9 lung resections, I nephrectomy, 1 lung resection and nephrectomy, and 2 craniotomies were performed among our patients. While hysterectomy was performed in 51 (26.8%) of 190 high-risk patients, hysterectomy was performed in only 23 (6.2%) of 371 low-risk patients (p < 0.01). From 1977-2006 metastases were resected in 18.3% (26/142) and from 2007-2014 in 16.7% (8/48) of high-risk patients.
CONCLUSION: In our center surgery, particularly in the form of hysterectomy, still plays a valuable role in the management of both low- and high-risk GTN.
STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1, 1977, and December 31, 2014, 371 patients with low-risk GTN and 190 patients with high-risk GTN were treated with chemotherapy, surgical interventions, or both. The indications for hysterectomy included excision of large uterine tumor masses, uterine hemorrhage or sepsis, or a drug-resistant uterine focus. Metastases were excised due to the presence of drug-resistant foci or complications of disease such as hemorrhage.
RESULTS: Over the period of 1977-2014 74 hysterectomies, 15 resections of vaginal metastases, 3 omentectomies, 13 adnexectomies, 9 lung resections, I nephrectomy, 1 lung resection and nephrectomy, and 2 craniotomies were performed among our patients. While hysterectomy was performed in 51 (26.8%) of 190 high-risk patients, hysterectomy was performed in only 23 (6.2%) of 371 low-risk patients (p < 0.01). From 1977-2006 metastases were resected in 18.3% (26/142) and from 2007-2014 in 16.7% (8/48) of high-risk patients.
CONCLUSION: In our center surgery, particularly in the form of hysterectomy, still plays a valuable role in the management of both low- and high-risk GTN.