Translational vision science & technology · 2022
Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avery Robert A, Go Cammille, Fisher Michael J, Liu Grant T, Garcia Arielle, Richter Meg, McGeehan Brendan, Quinn Graham E, Ying Gui-Shuang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine if visual acuity (VA) outcomes are comparable using the amblyopia treatment study HOTV protocol (ATS-HOTV) and electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) protocol in children with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs).
METHODS: Children enrolled in a prospective study of OPGs were eligible if they completed both the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS during the same visit. The contribution of age, testing order, having neurofibromatosis type 1, visual field loss, and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness to VA difference were assessed using generalized estimating equations to account for the intereye correlation.
RESULTS: Forty-eight children (median age, 10.3 years; range, 5.2-17.1 years; 49% female) met inclusion criteria and contributed 93 study eyes at their initial visit. Eleven patients (22 eyes) had more than one study visit, permitting longitudinal evaluation. ATS-HOTV measures of VA were higher than E-ETDRS at the initial (0.13 ± 0.36 vs. 0.23 ± 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], P < 0.001) and all visits (0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR, P < 0.001). VA remained significantly higher with ATS-HOTV regardless of test order, but the mean difference between tests was most profound when tested with ATS-HOTV first compared to E-ETDRS first (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: VA results differ significantly between the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS testing methods in children with OPGs. Given the wide range of ages and testing ability of children, one VA testing method should be used throughout longitudinal OPG clinical trials.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: It is imperative that age-appropriate VA testing methods are standardized across all pediatric OPG clinical trials.
METHODS: Children enrolled in a prospective study of OPGs were eligible if they completed both the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS during the same visit. The contribution of age, testing order, having neurofibromatosis type 1, visual field loss, and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness to VA difference were assessed using generalized estimating equations to account for the intereye correlation.
RESULTS: Forty-eight children (median age, 10.3 years; range, 5.2-17.1 years; 49% female) met inclusion criteria and contributed 93 study eyes at their initial visit. Eleven patients (22 eyes) had more than one study visit, permitting longitudinal evaluation. ATS-HOTV measures of VA were higher than E-ETDRS at the initial (0.13 ± 0.36 vs. 0.23 ± 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], P < 0.001) and all visits (0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR, P < 0.001). VA remained significantly higher with ATS-HOTV regardless of test order, but the mean difference between tests was most profound when tested with ATS-HOTV first compared to E-ETDRS first (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: VA results differ significantly between the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS testing methods in children with OPGs. Given the wide range of ages and testing ability of children, one VA testing method should be used throughout longitudinal OPG clinical trials.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: It is imperative that age-appropriate VA testing methods are standardized across all pediatric OPG clinical trials.