DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000000829
Expanded Cheek-Shaped Flap for Aesthetic Cheek Reconstruction in the Cervicoperiauricular Area.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The cervical area is well acknowledged as an ideal donor site for aesthetic reconstruction of the cheek, and tissue expansion may play an important role for maximally achieving such a purpose. However, the conventional design of the expanded cervical flap generally results in unsightly morbidity of the donor site. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of using an improvised cervical expanded flap in aesthetic reconstruction of the cheek.
METHODS
From July 2004 to October 2012, a total of 23 burn sequelae patients (30 cheeks) underwent cheek reconstruction with an expanded flap that originated from the cervicoperiauricular area. The procedures were initially carried out with the insertion of a round tissue expander in the cervicoperiauricular area, followed by serial inflation of the expander, and finally, transplantation of the expanded flap to the cheek in a rotation advancement fashion. The donor site closure was along the auricular sulcus.
RESULTS
The average area of the harvested flaps was 9.7 × 8.1 cm. All the flaps completely survived, only one major complication occur-a dome exposure of the tissue expander after the expansion was completed. The flap was salvaged, and the transfer stage was done without intact. Minor complications after flap transfer include: widened scar at the donor site, a "dog-ear" needing additional minor surgery, distal part of the flap transient congestion. The patients achieved very satisfactory results functionally and aesthetically.
CONCLUSIONS
Using the expanded cheek-shaped flap technique can provide a safe, thin, and color-matched flap in aesthetic reconstruction of the cheek with minimal donor site morbidity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.