Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
Age and number of lesions predict chalazion recurrence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sorensen Ryan, Calderara Gianmarco, Welsh Jonathan, Hick Elizabeth, Hsiou David, Chen Alicia, Hunt Patrick J, Mehta Jeel Jainesh, Allen Richard C, Williams Katherine
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Periocular lesions in pediatric patients usually require general anesthesia for surgical intervention. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns against multiple exposures to anesthesia in children younger than 3 years due to the increased risk of learning disabilities in this population. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with chalazion recurrence after surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review over a five-year period identified 649 patients at our institution undergoing surgical intervention for chalazion. The primary outcomes examined were as follows: (1) return to the operating room for additional surgical intervention and (2) recurrence of chalazion during convalescence from surgery and follow-up.
RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of patients suffered a recurrence after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression found younger age (p = 0.01), female sex (p = 0.01), and a greater number of chalazia drained (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with recurrence of chalazia after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting at a younger age and with a greater number of chalazion were statistically more likely to have a recurrence of chalazion after surgery. Given recurrence is more likely in younger children, reconciling this with the risk-benefit ratio with regard to FDA guidelines on anesthesia in children under three years is a critical consideration for ophthalmologists.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review over a five-year period identified 649 patients at our institution undergoing surgical intervention for chalazion. The primary outcomes examined were as follows: (1) return to the operating room for additional surgical intervention and (2) recurrence of chalazion during convalescence from surgery and follow-up.
RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of patients suffered a recurrence after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression found younger age (p = 0.01), female sex (p = 0.01), and a greater number of chalazia drained (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with recurrence of chalazia after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting at a younger age and with a greater number of chalazion were statistically more likely to have a recurrence of chalazion after surgery. Given recurrence is more likely in younger children, reconciling this with the risk-benefit ratio with regard to FDA guidelines on anesthesia in children under three years is a critical consideration for ophthalmologists.