American journal of surgery · 2006
Isolated main pancreatic duct injuries spectrum and management.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buccimazza Ines, Thomson Sandie R, Anderson Frank, Naidoo Namasha M, Clarke Damian L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We present our experience with the rare injury of isolated major pancreatic duct disruption.
METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, 3 females and 13 males whose age ranged from 4 to 46 years were identified. Stabs caused 2 and blunt trauma 14 injuries. Nine presented acutely. Delay occurred in 7 patients, 6 with pseudocysts and 1 with infected pancreatic necrosis.
RESULTS: Nine cases were managed in the acute phase: 6 by splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy and 2 by distal pancreatico-enteric anastomosis; 1 was drained. A small pseudocyst and transient pancreatic fistula were the only complications. The 6 cases with pseudocysts were managed endoscopically. Five were stented and 1 was drained without stent. Four had resolution. Two had stent cyst migration. One required a pancreaticojejunostomy and another distal pancreatectomy. One patient died of infected pancreatic necrosis. Long-term outcome could not be assessed.
CONCLUSION: In the acute situation, resection or distal pancreatico-enteric anastomoses are attainable with low morbidity. Endoscopic pseudocyst management options are feasible, with good short-term resolution. Giant cysts may be better managed operatively.
METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, 3 females and 13 males whose age ranged from 4 to 46 years were identified. Stabs caused 2 and blunt trauma 14 injuries. Nine presented acutely. Delay occurred in 7 patients, 6 with pseudocysts and 1 with infected pancreatic necrosis.
RESULTS: Nine cases were managed in the acute phase: 6 by splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy and 2 by distal pancreatico-enteric anastomosis; 1 was drained. A small pseudocyst and transient pancreatic fistula were the only complications. The 6 cases with pseudocysts were managed endoscopically. Five were stented and 1 was drained without stent. Four had resolution. Two had stent cyst migration. One required a pancreaticojejunostomy and another distal pancreatectomy. One patient died of infected pancreatic necrosis. Long-term outcome could not be assessed.
CONCLUSION: In the acute situation, resection or distal pancreatico-enteric anastomoses are attainable with low morbidity. Endoscopic pseudocyst management options are feasible, with good short-term resolution. Giant cysts may be better managed operatively.