DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105444
Neural underpinnings of freezing-related dynamic balance control in people with Parkinson's disease.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FOG; freezers) show impaired dynamic balance and experience falls more frequently compared to those without (non-freezers). Here, we explore the neural underpinnings of these freezing-related balance problems.
METHODS
12 freezers, 16 non-freezers and 14 controls performed a dynamic balance task in the lab. The next day, the same task was investigated in the MRI-scanner through motor imagery (MI). A visual imagery (VI) control task was also performed. Imagery engagement was determined by comparing the performance times between the dynamic balance task, and its MI- and VI-variants. Balance-related brain activations in regions of interest were contrasted between groups based on an MI > rest versus VI > rest contrast.
RESULTS
Freezers and non-freezers were matched for age, cognition and disease severity. Similar performance times between the balance control task and the MI-conditions revealed excellent imagery engagement. Compared to non-freezers, freezers showed decreased activation in regions of interest located in the left mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR; p = 0.006), right anterior cerebellum (p = 0.017) and cerebellar vermis (p < 0.001). Intriguingly, non-freezers showed higher activations in the cerebellar vermis than controls (p = 0.010).
CONCLUSION
Overall, we showed that decreased activation in the left MLR, and cerebellar regions in freezers relative to non-freezers could explain why dynamic balance is more affected in freezers. As non-freezers displayed increased cerebellar vermis activation compared to controls, it is possible that freezers show an inability to recruit sufficient compensatory cerebellar activity for effective dynamic balance control.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.