MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00381-017-3570-3

Медицинская библиотека · Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2017

Spontaneous complete regression of a brain stem glioma pathologically diagnosed as a high-grade glioma.

Ishihara Masahiro, Yamamoto Kazumi, Miwa Hideaki, Nishi Masaya

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous regressions of brain stem gliomas are extremely rare. Only six cases have been reported in the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a patient who was diagnosed with a pontomedullary dorsal brain stem glioma at the age of 15 years. An open biopsy showed the presence of an anaplastic glioma. Because the patient and her parents refused conventional therapies, including radiation and chemotherapy, we followed up the patient by performing magnetic resonance imaging scans on her every 3 months. At 3 months after biopsy, we observed the radiological disappearance of her tumor. One year after biopsy, the tumor retained the spontaneous complete regression observed earlier.

CONCLUSION

In this case report, we present the first report of the spontaneous complete regression of a brain stem glioma that was histologically proven to be a high-grade glioma and we believe that this regression was the natural progression of this case, as may be the scenario in a few other cases of brain stem gliomas.

Для цитирования: Ishihara Masahiro, Yamamoto Kazumi, Miwa Hideaki, Nishi Masaya. Spontaneous complete regression of a brain stem glioma pathologically diagnosed as a high-grade glioma.. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3570-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.