International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2006
Ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: a randomized controlled study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akoglu Ertap, Akkurt B Cagla Ozbakis, Inanoglu Kerem, Okuyucu Semsettin, Dagli Safak
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.
METHODS: Forty-six children aged 2-12 years, undergoing tonsillectomy were enrolled in the study. Group 1 (n=16) received bupivacaine, group 2 (n=15) received ropivacaine, and a group 3 (control) (n=15) received 9% NaCl (saline) infiltrated around each tonsil. Pain was evaluated using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS) recorded 15 min and 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively.
RESULTS: No difference was found in the demographic data among the groups. The pain scores were similar between the bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups (p>0.05). The pain scores in both analgesia groups were significantly (p<0.05) lower 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively compared to the control group. Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia were also significantly (p<0.05) different between the analgesia and control groups.
CONCLUSION: Local ropivacaine infiltration is a safe and effective method and equivalent to bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain.
METHODS: Forty-six children aged 2-12 years, undergoing tonsillectomy were enrolled in the study. Group 1 (n=16) received bupivacaine, group 2 (n=15) received ropivacaine, and a group 3 (control) (n=15) received 9% NaCl (saline) infiltrated around each tonsil. Pain was evaluated using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS) recorded 15 min and 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively.
RESULTS: No difference was found in the demographic data among the groups. The pain scores were similar between the bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups (p>0.05). The pain scores in both analgesia groups were significantly (p<0.05) lower 1, 4, 12, 16, and 24h postoperatively compared to the control group. Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia were also significantly (p<0.05) different between the analgesia and control groups.
CONCLUSION: Local ropivacaine infiltration is a safe and effective method and equivalent to bupivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain.