International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2012
Temperature superposition for fast computation of 3D temperature distributions during optimization and planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Salgaonkar Vasant A, Prakash Punit, Diederich Chris J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: A temperature superposition method has been developed for fast optimisation and planning of interstitial hyperthermia treatments with convectively cooled multi-transducer ultrasound applicators integrated within high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy catheters.
METHODS: Steady-state temperature distributions produced by individual tubular transducers capable of directional heating were pre-computed using finite element models (FEM) methods. The composite temperature distributions generated by multi-applicator implants were approximated as superposition sums of the pre-computed temperature profiles. Composite temperature distributions produced by the multi-applicator implants were also computed using accurate but computationally expensive FEM methods (considered here as the validation standard). Both methods were used for temperature calculation on a range of test implant geometries and representative patient cases (HDR implants in prostate (n = 13) and cervix (n = 2)), with optimised treatment plans created for the latter.
RESULTS: Difference between temperatures calculated by the superposition and FEM methods was below 0.37°C (95% confidence interval) in test implants at clinically relevant acoustic intensities (0.3-2.0 W/cm²) and blood perfusion (2 kg/m³/s). Difference in 41°C isothermal volumes was below 8.3%. Superposition-based optimisations followed by FEM forward calculations (hybrid plans) were completed 4-7 times faster than FEM-only plans (FEM optimisation + FEM forward). Mean T₉₀, T₅₀ and T₁₀ values from both plans were within 0.3°C, 0.4°C and 0.45°C respectively, and the mean acoustic intensities were within 0.23 W/cm².
CONCLUSIONS: Temperature superposition provides a fast technique for forward or optimised planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments with calculations comparable to more accurate but time consuming FEM methods.
METHODS: Steady-state temperature distributions produced by individual tubular transducers capable of directional heating were pre-computed using finite element models (FEM) methods. The composite temperature distributions generated by multi-applicator implants were approximated as superposition sums of the pre-computed temperature profiles. Composite temperature distributions produced by the multi-applicator implants were also computed using accurate but computationally expensive FEM methods (considered here as the validation standard). Both methods were used for temperature calculation on a range of test implant geometries and representative patient cases (HDR implants in prostate (n = 13) and cervix (n = 2)), with optimised treatment plans created for the latter.
RESULTS: Difference between temperatures calculated by the superposition and FEM methods was below 0.37°C (95% confidence interval) in test implants at clinically relevant acoustic intensities (0.3-2.0 W/cm²) and blood perfusion (2 kg/m³/s). Difference in 41°C isothermal volumes was below 8.3%. Superposition-based optimisations followed by FEM forward calculations (hybrid plans) were completed 4-7 times faster than FEM-only plans (FEM optimisation + FEM forward). Mean T₉₀, T₅₀ and T₁₀ values from both plans were within 0.3°C, 0.4°C and 0.45°C respectively, and the mean acoustic intensities were within 0.23 W/cm².
CONCLUSIONS: Temperature superposition provides a fast technique for forward or optimised planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments with calculations comparable to more accurate but time consuming FEM methods.