Is thyroid core needle biopsy a valid compliment to fine-needle aspiration?

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has long been considered the first and an important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. The advantages of FNA include simplicity, safety, cost-effectiveness, high diagnostic accuracy, and low complication rate. Nevertheless, limitations associated with FNA include a substantial rate of inconclusive results and indeterminate interpretations. Therefore, core needle biopsy (CNB) of the thyroid gland has been proposed as a complementary or even alternate diagnostic method to evaluate thyroid nodules. Although controversial, a growing number of researchers have reported CNB to be an effective and safe sampling method for thyroid nodules, especially for cases with inadequate or indeterminate FNA yields. Skeptics highlight local pain and bleeding risk. Supporters highlight the potential likelihood of overcoming FNA limitations by obtaining a larger amount of tissue and using architecture and cellular details to guide possible ancillary testing. This review evaluates the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of CNB as compared with FNA of the thyroid gland.