American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2011
Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tseng Yu-Chuan, Pan Chin-Yun, Chou Szu-Ting, Liao Chen-Yi, Lai Sheng-Tsung, Chen Chun-Ming, Chang Hong-Po, Yang Yi-Hsin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to distinguish between orthodontic patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions requiring surgery and those not requiring surgery by conducting a receiver operating characteristic analysis of cephalometric variables.
METHODS: We used lateral cephalometric radiographs of 80 subjects (40 nonsurgical and 40 surgical patients) with Class III malocclusions and obtain 25 cephalometric measurements using computerized cephalometry. Of these, 14 measurements showed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the ability of the 14 cephalometric measurements in distinguishing between the 2 groups. Six statistically validated and clinically relevant measurements were used to obtain the optimum discriminant effectiveness.
RESULTS: For a Class III malocclusion patient with any 4 of these 6 measurement criteria, the sensitivity was 88% and the specificity was 90% in determining the need for surgical treatment: overjet, ≤-4.73 mm; Wits appraisal, ≤-11.18 mm; L1-MP angle, ≤80.8°; Mx/Mn ratio, ≤65.9%; overbite, ≤-0.18 mm; and gonial angle, ≥120.8°.
CONCLUSIONS: We selected 6 cephalometric measurements as the minimum number of discriminators required to obtain the optimum discriminant effectiveness of diagnosis between surgical and nonsurgical treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.
METHODS: We used lateral cephalometric radiographs of 80 subjects (40 nonsurgical and 40 surgical patients) with Class III malocclusions and obtain 25 cephalometric measurements using computerized cephalometry. Of these, 14 measurements showed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the ability of the 14 cephalometric measurements in distinguishing between the 2 groups. Six statistically validated and clinically relevant measurements were used to obtain the optimum discriminant effectiveness.
RESULTS: For a Class III malocclusion patient with any 4 of these 6 measurement criteria, the sensitivity was 88% and the specificity was 90% in determining the need for surgical treatment: overjet, ≤-4.73 mm; Wits appraisal, ≤-11.18 mm; L1-MP angle, ≤80.8°; Mx/Mn ratio, ≤65.9%; overbite, ≤-0.18 mm; and gonial angle, ≥120.8°.
CONCLUSIONS: We selected 6 cephalometric measurements as the minimum number of discriminators required to obtain the optimum discriminant effectiveness of diagnosis between surgical and nonsurgical treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.