DOI 10.1080/07853890.2025.2529572
Efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery reconstruction for symptomatic vertebral artery origin in-stent restenosis or occlusion: a ten-year retrospective cohort study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The optimal management of symptomatic vertebral artery in-stent restenosis or occlusion (SVISRO) after stent-assisted angioplasty (SAA) at the vertebral artery origin remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vertebral artery reconstruction surgery (VRS) surgery among SVISRO patients.
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data for SVISRO patients admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between May 2011 and November 2021. The stroke recurrence and stroke-free rates during the follow-up (FU) period and the patients' neurological statuses at the last FU were compared between a VRS group and an intensive medical therapy (IMT) group.
RESULTS
Sixty-two SVISRO patients with an average age of 60.1 ± 8.3 years and an average FU duration of 67.6 ± 32.5 months were studied. The VRS group had significantly fewer stroke recurrences than the IMT group did (5.7% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.034). A 154-month stroke-free rate of 73.8% (95% CI, 24.5% to 93.7%) was observed in the VRS group, whereas the IMT group had a stroke-free rate of 33.9% (95% CI, 17.3% to 75.0%). The hazard ratio (log-rank) between the two groups was 0.234 (95% CI, 0.063-0.871; p = 0.048). The modified Rankin scale score for the VRS group was significantly better than that for the IMT group at the final FU (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with SVISRO secondary to SAA, VRS targeting the extracranial vertebral artery (V1-V2) appears to reduce stroke recurrence, increase the stroke-free rate and improve neurological status.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.