DOI 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002732
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Radiomic Features of 18F-FDG PET in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether a radiomic analysis of pretreatment F-FDG PET can predict prognosis in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
METHODS
Forty-two patients who were diagnosed as having HL and underwent pretreatment F-FDG PET scans were retrospectively enrolled. For each patient, we extracted 450 radiomic features from PET images. The prognostic significance of the clinical and radiomic features was assessed in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Receiver operating characteristic curve, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to examine the potential independent predictors and to evaluate the predictive value.
RESULTS
Intensity nonuniformity extracted from a gray-level run-length matrix and the Ann Arbor stage were independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 22.8, P < 0.001; HR = 7.6, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 14.5, P = 0.012; HR = 8.5, P = 0.048), respectively. In addition, SUV kurtosis was an independent prognosticator for PFS (HR = 6.6, P = 0.026). We devised a prognostic scoring system based on these 3 risk predictors. The proposed scoring system further improved the risk stratification of the current staging classification (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The radiomic feature intensity nonuniformity is an independent prognostic predictor of PFS and OS in patients with HL. We devised a prognostic scoring system, which may be more beneficial for patient risk stratification in guiding therapy compared with the current Ann Arbor staging system.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.