Clinical nuclear medicine · 2021
No Evidence to Favor 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD for Ictal Brain Perfusion SPECT for Identification of the Seizure Onset Zone.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jaber Mariam, Taherpour Jila, Voges Berthold, Apostolova Ivayla, Sauvigny Thomas, House Patrick M, Lanz Michael, Lindenau Matthias, Klutmann Susanne, Martens Tobias, Stodieck Stefan, Buchert Ralph
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Ictal brain perfusion SPECT with the tracer 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD is widely used for identification of the epileptic seizure onset zone (SOZ) in presurgical evaluation if standard pointers are uncertain or inconsistent. For both tracers, there are theoretical arguments to favor it over the other for this task. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of ictal brain perfusion SPECT between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD in a rather large patient sample.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively included 196 patients from clinical routine in whom ictal perfusion SPECT had been performed with stabilized 99mTc-HMPAO (n = 110) or 99mTc-ECD (n = 86). Lateralization and localization of the SOZ were obtained by the consensus of 2 independent readers based on visual inspection of the SPECT images.
RESULTS: The 99mTc-HMPAO group and the 99mTc-ECD group were well matched with respect to age, sex, age at first seizure, duration of disease, seizure frequency, history of previous brain surgery, and findings of presurgical MRI. The proportion of lateralizing ictal SPECT did not differ significantly between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD (65.5% vs 72.1%, P = 0.36). Sensitivity of ictal perfusion SPECT (independent of the tracer) for correct localization of the SOZ in 62 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and at least worthwhile improvement (Engel scale ≤ III) 12 months after temporal epilepsy surgery was 63%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide evidence to favor 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD for identification of the SOZ by ictal perfusion SPECT.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively included 196 patients from clinical routine in whom ictal perfusion SPECT had been performed with stabilized 99mTc-HMPAO (n = 110) or 99mTc-ECD (n = 86). Lateralization and localization of the SOZ were obtained by the consensus of 2 independent readers based on visual inspection of the SPECT images.
RESULTS: The 99mTc-HMPAO group and the 99mTc-ECD group were well matched with respect to age, sex, age at first seizure, duration of disease, seizure frequency, history of previous brain surgery, and findings of presurgical MRI. The proportion of lateralizing ictal SPECT did not differ significantly between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD (65.5% vs 72.1%, P = 0.36). Sensitivity of ictal perfusion SPECT (independent of the tracer) for correct localization of the SOZ in 62 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and at least worthwhile improvement (Engel scale ≤ III) 12 months after temporal epilepsy surgery was 63%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide evidence to favor 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD for identification of the SOZ by ictal perfusion SPECT.