Annals of plastic surgery · 2015
Internal Mammary Artery Perforator-Supercharged Prefabricated Cervicothoracic Flap for Face and Neck Reconstruction.
Clinical StudyСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Guang-Shuai, Zan Tao, Li Qing-Feng, Li Haizhou, Dong Ming-Min, Liu Lin-Bo, Gu Bin, Li Hua, Ding Shuang, Zheng Yan, Liu Kai, Xie Yun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prefabricated flap is an important technique to reconstruct massive face and neck skin defects. But its vascularization remains unpredictable and often leads to abnormal blood supply of the harvested flap, even necrosis. Flap supercharging and turbo supercharging techniques are effectively used to improve flap blood supply. However, few studies have been reported on the application of these techniques in prefabricated induced expanded flaps.
METHODS: From March 2008 to September 2012, 13 patients who have face and neck soft tissue defects were treated with prefabricated cervicothoracic flap. To overcome insufficient blood supply, 5 of them received additional microvascular augmentation in which the second or third perforator of the internal mammary artery (IMAP) and its venae comitantes were anastomosed to facial or superficial temporal vessels, contrary to the remaining 8 patients. The following results were compared: flap viability, hospital stay, complications, frequency of dressing change, reoperation rate, and remaining scars.
RESULTS: No flap necrosis was observed in patients who received the supercharging procedure. By contrast, of the 8 patients who were not treated with supercharging technique, various degrees of flap necrosis occurred in 3 patients, 2 of whom received secondary operations. The frequency of dressing changes, the hospital stay, and hospital cost were reduced. Postoperative view showed better aesthetic restoration.
CONCLUSIONS: The IMAP-supercharged cervicothoracic flap technique offers a reliable method for massive face and neck reconstruction. We recommended that the IMAP should always be preserved in the flap as a saving option for potential flap congestion or arterial insufficiency.
METHODS: From March 2008 to September 2012, 13 patients who have face and neck soft tissue defects were treated with prefabricated cervicothoracic flap. To overcome insufficient blood supply, 5 of them received additional microvascular augmentation in which the second or third perforator of the internal mammary artery (IMAP) and its venae comitantes were anastomosed to facial or superficial temporal vessels, contrary to the remaining 8 patients. The following results were compared: flap viability, hospital stay, complications, frequency of dressing change, reoperation rate, and remaining scars.
RESULTS: No flap necrosis was observed in patients who received the supercharging procedure. By contrast, of the 8 patients who were not treated with supercharging technique, various degrees of flap necrosis occurred in 3 patients, 2 of whom received secondary operations. The frequency of dressing changes, the hospital stay, and hospital cost were reduced. Postoperative view showed better aesthetic restoration.
CONCLUSIONS: The IMAP-supercharged cervicothoracic flap technique offers a reliable method for massive face and neck reconstruction. We recommended that the IMAP should always be preserved in the flap as a saving option for potential flap congestion or arterial insufficiency.