Molecular carcinogenesis · 1997
Analysis of the E-cadherin and P-cadherin promoters in murine keratinocyte cell lines from different stages of mouse skin carcinogenesis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Faraldo M L, Rodrigo I, Behrens J, Birchmeier W, Cano A
Аннотация
We previously isolated the 5' upstream sequences of the mouse P-cadherin gene, in which putative binding sites for several transcription factors were identified between nt-101 and +30. In the study reported here, the promoter activity of the postulated 5' cis-acting sequences of the P-cadherin promoter, and the activity of the proximal E-cadherin promoter were investigated in several murine keratinocyte cell lines showing different levels of P- and E-cadherin expression as well as different morphology and tumorigenic behavior. Cell-type specificity and optimal activity of P-cadherin expression in murine keratinocytes was conferred by 5' sequences located between nt -200 and +30, and the GC-rich region (nt -101 to +80) and a CCAAT box element (nt -65) had a major regulatory role. The cell-type specificity of the E-cadherin promoter, on the other hand, was mediated by a combination of positive regulatory elements, a GC-rich region (nt -58 to -24), and a CCAAT box (nt -65) and repressor elements inside the E-pal sequence. Interestingly, the maximum repressor effect of the E-pal element was observed in non-expressing undifferentiated spindle cells. In vitro binding studies indicated that the GC-rich region of the P-cadherin promoter was mainly recognized by Sp1-related nuclear factors, whereas both AP2- and Sp1-related factors were involved in the interaction of the GC-rich region of the E-cadherin promoter. Common factors (probably related to the CP1 family) seemed also to be involved in the recognition of the CCAAT-box element of both the E- and P-cadherin promoters, but additional specific factors participated in the interaction with the CCAAT box of the E-cadherin promoter. Our studies also support the hypothesis that loss or modification of some of the regulatory factors occurs during mouse skin tumor progression.