Reference Values for Central Airway Dimensions on CT Images of Children and Adolescents.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to acquire normative data on central airway dimensions on chest CT scans in the pediatric population.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Chest CT findings reported as normal by a radiologist were collected retrospectively at 10 international centers. An experienced and independent thoracic radiologist reevaluated all CT scans for image quality and for normal findings. Semiautomated image analysis was performed to measure dimensions of the trachea and right and left main bronchi at inspiration. Intrathoracic tracheal length was measured from carina to thorax inlet. Cross-sectional area and short and long axes were measured perpendicular to the longitudinal airway axis starting from the carina every centimeter upward for the trachea and every 0.5 cm downward for the main bronchi. The effects on airway diameters of age, sex, intrathoracic tracheal length, and distance from the carina were investigated by use of mixed-effects models analysis.
RESULTS
Among 1160 CT scans collected, 388 were evaluated as normal by the independent radiologist with sufficient image quality and adequate inspiratory volume level. Central airways were successfully semiautomatically analyzed in 294 of 388 CT studies. Age, sex, intrathoracic tracheal length, and distance from carina were all significant predictors in the models for tracheal and right and left main bronchial diameters (p < 0.001). The central airway dimensions increased with age up to 20 years, and dimensions were larger in male than in female adolescents.
CONCLUSION
Normative data were determined for the central airways of children and adolescents. Central airway dimensions depended on distance from the carina and on intrathoracic tracheal length.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.