Pharyngeal swallowing in older adults: Kinematic analysis using three-dimensional dynamic computed tomography.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of age on swallowing with a focus on structural movement, timing and duration of physiologic events.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
SETTING
Tertiary University Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS
Community-dwelling adults (3 age groups): younger 20 to 39 (n = 23; mean 32 ± 5), middle-aged 40 to 59 (n = 29; mean 49 ± 5) and older adults 60 to 74 (n = 15; mean 67 ± 5).
INTERVENTION: One 10-mL honey-thick liquid (1700 mPa) swallow was studied using 320-row area detector computed tomography scanning.
MEASUREMENTS: Kinematic analysis was performed for each swallow including temporal characteristics and structural movements.
RESULTS
The duration of velopharyngeal closure and laryngeal closure (including epiglottis inversion, laryngeal vestibule closure, true vocal cord closure) was significantly different by age group (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P = 0.017, P = 0.041, respectively). Events were prolonged in older adults compared with middle-aged and younger adults. The pharyngeal phase was longer for older adults. Velopharyngeal closure started earlier and continued until after complete UES opening. In younger adults, velopharyngeal and laryngeal opening occurred before complete UES opening. No differences were found in bolus movement through the oropharynx by group.
CONCLUSION
During swallowing, older adults had a longer pharyngeal phase characterised by prolonged velopharyngeal and laryngeal closure. This difference may be a protective mechanism to compensate for age-related weakness. A better understanding of the mechanism by which this adaptation occurs is needed to tailor rehabilitation strategies and to maintain swallowing function during the lifespan.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.