MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2001.119862

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2001

Pathologic analysis of routine tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy specimens.

Strong E B, Rubinstein B, Senders C W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Recent literature has suggested that histopathologic analysis of routine tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) specimens may be unnecessary. This study investigates T&A specimen handling practices in the United States between 1989 and 1999.

METHODS

Surveys were sent to 4715 members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology. Surveys assessed practice type, pathologic processing practices (full, gross, no pathology), and reasons for change. The authors also performed a retrospective analysis of 1583 pediatric T&A specimens for evidence of occult malignancy.

RESULTS

Practice types were 80% private, 12% academic, 6% salaried, and 2% military. Chi squared analysis revealed a significant increase (P < 0.001) in respondents ordering "gross only" and "no pathology." The retrospective analysis found no occult malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a statistically significant increase in the number of otolaryngologists sending routine T&A specimens for "gross only" and "no pathology." There was no correlation between the type of practice and changes in pathologic analysis performed.

Для цитирования: Strong E B, Rubinstein B, Senders C W. Pathologic analysis of routine tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy specimens.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.119862.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.