Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2010
[Dual-color/dual-fusion interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization probe for monitoring tumor load during imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DU Qing-feng, Zhang Song, Liu Xiao-li, Meng Fang-yi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of dual-color and dual-fusion interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) in determining the tumor load in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving imatinib therapy.
METHODS: The BCR-ABL fusion gene was detected by FISH in 24 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. The sensitivity and specificity of D-FISH were compared with those of single-fusion FISH (S-FISH) and RT-PCR.
RESULTS: D-FISH was more sensitive and specific than S-FISH. In normal control subjects, the cutoff rates of D-FISH and S-FISH were 0.73% and 6.24%, respectively, showing a significant difference between them. In 24 CML cases receiving imatinib treatment, the positivity rates of S-FISH and D-FISH were 7/24 (29.2%) and 13/24 (54.2%), respectively. The results of D-FISH had a high correlation to that of RT-PCR.
CONCLUSION: With lower false positive and false negative results, D-FISH can be used as a sensitive and specific method for monitoring the changes of the tumor load in CML patients during imatinib treatment.
METHODS: The BCR-ABL fusion gene was detected by FISH in 24 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. The sensitivity and specificity of D-FISH were compared with those of single-fusion FISH (S-FISH) and RT-PCR.
RESULTS: D-FISH was more sensitive and specific than S-FISH. In normal control subjects, the cutoff rates of D-FISH and S-FISH were 0.73% and 6.24%, respectively, showing a significant difference between them. In 24 CML cases receiving imatinib treatment, the positivity rates of S-FISH and D-FISH were 7/24 (29.2%) and 13/24 (54.2%), respectively. The results of D-FISH had a high correlation to that of RT-PCR.
CONCLUSION: With lower false positive and false negative results, D-FISH can be used as a sensitive and specific method for monitoring the changes of the tumor load in CML patients during imatinib treatment.