Strabismus · 2011
Tissue adhesives as an alternative for conjunctival closure in strabismus surgeries.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Basmak Hikmet, Gursoy Huseyin, Cakmak Ayse İdil, Niyaz Leyla, Yildirim Nilgun, Sahin Afsun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Comparison of conjunctival closure with fibrin glue and conventional closure in strabismus surgeries.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients undergoing strabismus surgery were studied. Group 1 included twelve cases in whom Tisseel was used for closure and group 2 included seventeen cases in whom 7/0 Vicryl was used. Severity of redness, watering, pain, and discomfort in opening eyes were evaluated postoperatively.
RESULTS: In the first hour, severe pain was experienced in both groups without statistical significance; but in group 1, pain was less severe in the 12th and 24th hour (P < .0001). After the first hour severity of watering was less in group 1 (P < .0001). Discomfort in opening eyes was detected in fifteen patients in group 2 in the first 12 hours where only one case with fibrin glue had discomfort. In the second week, no differences in severity of complaints were seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Conjunctival closure with Tisseel following strabismus surgery might be an alternative to suturing.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients undergoing strabismus surgery were studied. Group 1 included twelve cases in whom Tisseel was used for closure and group 2 included seventeen cases in whom 7/0 Vicryl was used. Severity of redness, watering, pain, and discomfort in opening eyes were evaluated postoperatively.
RESULTS: In the first hour, severe pain was experienced in both groups without statistical significance; but in group 1, pain was less severe in the 12th and 24th hour (P < .0001). After the first hour severity of watering was less in group 1 (P < .0001). Discomfort in opening eyes was detected in fifteen patients in group 2 in the first 12 hours where only one case with fibrin glue had discomfort. In the second week, no differences in severity of complaints were seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Conjunctival closure with Tisseel following strabismus surgery might be an alternative to suturing.