Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi · 2009
[Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeng Si-yuan, Liang Mei-rong, Li Long-yu, Wu Yun-yan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of surgical complications and surgical failure of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III.
METHODS: From Jan 2002 to Jun 2007, 1256 patients with CIN III confirmed by histopathologic punch biopsy and excision biopsy of cervical specimens were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 74 patients accepted loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), 869 patients adopted cold knife conization (CKC), 49 patients received vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix, as well as 264 patients accepted external fascia hysterectomy, Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of surgical efficacy and complications of different surgical treatments.
RESULTS: The surgical failure incidence of LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy were 4.1% (3/74), 0.2% (2/869), 0 and 0.4% (1/264) respectively, which was significantly higher in LEEP than that in CKC (P = 0.004) and external fascia hysterectomy (P = 0.034), while there was no statistical difference between CKC and external fascia hysterectomy (P = 0.549). The rate of surgical complications of LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy were 8.1% (6/74), 6.2% (54/869), 6.1% (3/49) and 2.3% (6/264) respectively, which were not statistically significant (P = 0.067) among them.
CONCLUSION: LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy are all secure and effective procedures for patients with CIN III, who can take the individual choice depending on their different conditions.
METHODS: From Jan 2002 to Jun 2007, 1256 patients with CIN III confirmed by histopathologic punch biopsy and excision biopsy of cervical specimens were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 74 patients accepted loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), 869 patients adopted cold knife conization (CKC), 49 patients received vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix, as well as 264 patients accepted external fascia hysterectomy, Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of surgical efficacy and complications of different surgical treatments.
RESULTS: The surgical failure incidence of LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy were 4.1% (3/74), 0.2% (2/869), 0 and 0.4% (1/264) respectively, which was significantly higher in LEEP than that in CKC (P = 0.004) and external fascia hysterectomy (P = 0.034), while there was no statistical difference between CKC and external fascia hysterectomy (P = 0.549). The rate of surgical complications of LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy were 8.1% (6/74), 6.2% (54/869), 6.1% (3/49) and 2.3% (6/264) respectively, which were not statistically significant (P = 0.067) among them.
CONCLUSION: LEEP, CKC, vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix and external fascia hysterectomy are all secure and effective procedures for patients with CIN III, who can take the individual choice depending on their different conditions.