MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00160-s

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 1995

Soft-tissue sarcoma of the vagina and vulva: a clinicopathologic study.

Curtin J P, Saigo P, Slucher B, Venkatraman E S, Mychalczak B, Hoskins W J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinicopathologic characteristics of vulvovaginal soft-tissue sarcomas, and to correlate these variables with response to treatment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the records of 24 women treated at Memorial Hospital for sarcoma of either the vulva or vagina over 20 years (1974-1993). Archival pathology specimens were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis, histology, and grade of the tumor.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients had sarcomas arising from the vagina and nine had primary vulvar tumors. Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histology (n = 13). Twenty-three of 24 women underwent surgical excision as their primary therapy. Twenty-three were available for follow-up, and 16 of them (70%) are free of disease at a median follow-up time of 47 months (range 12-156, mean 59). Five women died of progressive disease and two are currently alive with persistent or recurrent disease. Grade was the most important predictor of outcome; all seven women with low-grade tumors are alive without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors of the lower genital tract. The primary therapy is surgical; adjuvant radiation therapy is indicated for high-grade tumors and locally recurrent low-grade sarcomas.

Для цитирования: Curtin J P, Saigo P, Slucher B, Venkatraman E S, Mychalczak B, Hoskins W J. Soft-tissue sarcoma of the vagina and vulva: a clinicopathologic study.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00160-s.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.