MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/respcare.12897

Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory care · 2025

AARC and PALISI Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Critical Asthma.

White Benjamin R, Miller Andrew G, Baker Joyce, Basnet Sangita, Carroll Christopher L, Craven Hannah, Dalabih Abdallah, Fitzpatrick Anne M, Glogowski Joel, Irazuzta Jose Enrique, Kapuscinski Christine A, Lenox Jesslyn, Lovinsky-Desir Stephanie, Maue Danielle K, Moody Gerald, Newth Christopher, Rehder Kyle J, Sochet Anthony A, Said Sana J, Willis L Denise, Whipple Elizabeth C, Goodfellow Lynda, Abu-Sultaneh Samer

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To address the lack of guidance for clinicians in their care of children with critical asthma, a multidisciplinary team of medical providers used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make the following recommendations: 1. We suggest the use of continuous inhaled short-acting β agonist (SABA) over frequent intermittent SABA in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 2. We suggest the use of either high- or low-dose continuous inhaled SABA regimens in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 3. We suggest the use of either dexamethasone or methylprednisolone (or an equivalent dose of prednisone/prednisolone) for children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 4. We suggest the use of intravenous (IV) magnesium (intermittent or continuous) as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) 5. We cannot recommend for or against the use of IV methylxanthines as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 6. We suggest the use of an IV SABA infusion as an adjunct therapy in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) 7. We cannot recommend for or against the application of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children presenting with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 8. We suggest the use of bi-level positive airway pressure over conventional oxygen therapy in children presenting with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 9. We cannot recommend for or against the application of bi-level positive airway pressure over high-flow nasal cannula for children hospitalized with critical asthma with persistent hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 10. We cannot recommend for or against the application of heliox in children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) 11. We suggest the use of a dedicated protocol or pathway for managing children treated for critical asthma. (Conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).

Для цитирования: White Benjamin R, Miller Andrew G, Baker Joyce, Basnet Sangita, Carroll Christopher L, Craven Hannah, Dalabih Abdallah, Fitzpatrick Anne M, Glogowski Joel, Irazuzta Jose Enrique, Kapuscinski Christine A, Lenox Jesslyn, Lovinsky-Desir Stephanie, Maue Danielle K, Moody Gerald, Newth Christopher, Rehder Kyle J, Sochet Anthony A, Said Sana J, Willis L Denise, Whipple Elizabeth C, Goodfellow Lynda, Abu-Sultaneh Samer. AARC and PALISI Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Critical Asthma.. Respiratory care. 2025. DOI: 10.1089/respcare.12897.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.