MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5505/tjtes.2013.14306

Медицинская библиотека · Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2013

[Should appendectomy be performed in Amyand's hernia?: two case reports].

Çığşar Emine Burcu, Karadağ Çetin Ali, Sever Nihat, Dokucu Ali Ihsan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The presence of appendix vermiformis in an inguinal hernia sac is called Amyand's hernia. The disease is named after Claudius Amyand, who performed the first documented and successful appendectomy during a hernioplasty in 1975. Finding an appendix within an inguinal hernia is reported at a rate of 0.51%-1% in the adult population, whereas there is no reported frequency of Amyand's hernia in children due to its rare occurrence. Here, we report two cases of Amyand's hernia. The first is a newborn, diagnosed with strangulated Amyand's hernia by preoperative ultrasound examination of the groin. In this case, the appendix had compromised blood supply, so we performed appendectomy during the hernioplasty. The second patient was diagnosed with Amyand's hernia during elective hernioplasty. In this case, the appendix had no evidence of circulatory or inflammatory disorders, so we performed simple hernioplasty and left the appendix in the abdominal cavity. In Amyand's hernia, there are no standards in approaching the appendix. Appendectomy is not a necessity unless there are circulatory or inflammatory injuries.

Для цитирования: Çığşar Emine Burcu, Karadağ Çetin Ali, Sever Nihat, Dokucu Ali Ihsan. [Should appendectomy be performed in Amyand's hernia?: two case reports].. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES. 2013. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.14306.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.