International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2013
Analysis of a continuous series of 34 young patients with early-stage cervical cancer selected for a vaginal radical trachelectomy: should "staging" conization be systematically performed before this procedure?
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uzan Catherine, Gouy Sebastien, Desroque Delphine, Pomel Christophe, Duvillard Pierre, Balleyguier Corrine, Haie-Meder Christine, Morice Philippe
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT) is the most widely evaluated form of conservative management of young patients with early-stage (IB1) cervical cancer. Patients with nodal involvement or a tumor size greater than 2 cm are not eligible for such treatment. The aim of this study is to report the impact of a "staging" conization before VRT.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 34 patients potentially selected for VRT for a clinical and radiologic cervical tumor less than 2 cm. Among them, 28 underwent finally a VRT (20 of them having a previous conization before this procedure) and 6 patients with macroscopic cervical cancer, confirmed by punch biopsies, "eligible" for VRT (<2 cm) had undergone "staging" conization (without further VRT) to confirm the tumor size and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) status.
RESULTS: Six patients having "staging" conization before VRT had finally been deemed contraindications to VRT due to the presence of a histologically confirmed tumor greater than 2 cm and/or associated with multiple foci of LVSI. Among 28 patients who underwent VRT, 1 received adjuvant chemoradiation (this patient recurred and died of disease). Two patients treated with RVT (without postoperative treatment) recurred. Ten pregnancies (9 spontaneous and 1 induced) were observed in 9 patients. Among 4 patients with macroscopic "visible" tumor who do not underwent a "staging" conization before VRT, 2 recurred. Among 11 patients who underwent VRT and having LVSI, 3 recurred.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that if a conization is not performed initially, it should then be included among the staging procedures to select patients for VRT.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 34 patients potentially selected for VRT for a clinical and radiologic cervical tumor less than 2 cm. Among them, 28 underwent finally a VRT (20 of them having a previous conization before this procedure) and 6 patients with macroscopic cervical cancer, confirmed by punch biopsies, "eligible" for VRT (<2 cm) had undergone "staging" conization (without further VRT) to confirm the tumor size and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) status.
RESULTS: Six patients having "staging" conization before VRT had finally been deemed contraindications to VRT due to the presence of a histologically confirmed tumor greater than 2 cm and/or associated with multiple foci of LVSI. Among 28 patients who underwent VRT, 1 received adjuvant chemoradiation (this patient recurred and died of disease). Two patients treated with RVT (without postoperative treatment) recurred. Ten pregnancies (9 spontaneous and 1 induced) were observed in 9 patients. Among 4 patients with macroscopic "visible" tumor who do not underwent a "staging" conization before VRT, 2 recurred. Among 11 patients who underwent VRT and having LVSI, 3 recurred.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that if a conization is not performed initially, it should then be included among the staging procedures to select patients for VRT.