Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2012
Unexpected malignancies after laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomies (LASH): an analysis of 1,584 LASH cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Theben Juliane U, Schellong Alexander R M, Altgassen Christopher, Kelling Katharina, Schneider Stephanie, Große-Drieling Dietmar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to identify the rate of unexpected malignancies after laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomies (LASH) and describe the therapy regime.
METHODS: The research is based on a retrospective chart analysis of patients undergoing a simple hysterectomy in the gynecological endoscopy department of a general hospital in Germany.
RESULTS: 2,577 simple hysterectomies conducted between March 2005 and March 2010 were sub-classified in different types of hysterectomies (vaginal-, abdominal-, total-, abdominal supracervical hysterectomy, LAVH, and LASH). This study focuses on the LASH sub-group of 1,584 patients and does not make any comparisons to other operative approaches. Out of the 1,584 patients, 87.8 % (n = 1,391) received preoperative screening to exclude dysplasia or malignancy based on the policy of the German Association for gynecology and obstetrics (DGGG). The screening includes cytology (Pap-smear) and preoperative ultrasound of the uterus or dilatation and curettage (d&c). Unexpected malignancies were found in 0.25 % (n = 4) of the patients pre-screened according to DGGG protocol. Out of the four malign patients, two had endometrial cancer. Two patients had leiomyosarcoma.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that there is a small probability of unexpected malignancies even in correctly pre-screened patients for LASH procedures. Yet in the short-term (28-52 months), malign patients remain recurrence free after treatment. LASH is therefore a good procedure for assumed benign disease.
METHODS: The research is based on a retrospective chart analysis of patients undergoing a simple hysterectomy in the gynecological endoscopy department of a general hospital in Germany.
RESULTS: 2,577 simple hysterectomies conducted between March 2005 and March 2010 were sub-classified in different types of hysterectomies (vaginal-, abdominal-, total-, abdominal supracervical hysterectomy, LAVH, and LASH). This study focuses on the LASH sub-group of 1,584 patients and does not make any comparisons to other operative approaches. Out of the 1,584 patients, 87.8 % (n = 1,391) received preoperative screening to exclude dysplasia or malignancy based on the policy of the German Association for gynecology and obstetrics (DGGG). The screening includes cytology (Pap-smear) and preoperative ultrasound of the uterus or dilatation and curettage (d&c). Unexpected malignancies were found in 0.25 % (n = 4) of the patients pre-screened according to DGGG protocol. Out of the four malign patients, two had endometrial cancer. Two patients had leiomyosarcoma.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that there is a small probability of unexpected malignancies even in correctly pre-screened patients for LASH procedures. Yet in the short-term (28-52 months), malign patients remain recurrence free after treatment. LASH is therefore a good procedure for assumed benign disease.