Journal of pediatric urology · 2021
Outcomes following emergency fixation of torted and non-torted testes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boam Tristan, Kiely David, Peeraully Riyad, Jancauskaite Milda, Fraser Nia
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Scrotal exploration is a frequently performed emergency procedure in children. It is a subject of debate as to whether and how a non-torted testis should be fixed, with a wide variation in practice across the UK. This study aims to ascertain whether the method of testicular fixation (if any) impacts on patient outcomes.
METHODS: A review of all emergency scrotal explorations performed in children under the age of 18 between 2008 and 2018 in a tertiary Paediatric Surgery unit was undertaken. Patients were categorised by initial fixation method, chi squared analysis was used to compare complication and reoperation rates.
RESULTS: 522 boys were taken to theatre, 424 had a unilateral procedure and 98 had bilateral; after 35 orchidectomies, 585 testes were left in situ. The most frequent diagnosis at operation was torted testicular appendage (n = 278, 53%), followed by testicular torsion (n = 79, 15%). The number of testes by category of fixation were: 72 no documented fixation, 130 dartos pouch only, 34 absorbable sutures, 346 non-absorbable sutures and 3 unspecified sutures. There was no difference in the reattendance rate between groups after outliers were removed (p = 0.72). Thirty-seven patients experienced complications, most commonly ongoing pain. Nine patients required an ipsilateral reoperation, 25 underwent a contralateral operation at a later date. The complication rate appeared to be higher in the no fixation group compared to the dartos (p = 0.02) and sutured groups (p = 0.048). Testes in the no fixation group had a higher reoperation rate compared to the sutured group (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is a detailed analysis of a wide variety of emergency testicular fixation methods in a large cohort, including the routine fixation of non-torted testes. Whilst there appears to be a benefit to using sutured or dartos fixation, this merits cautious interpretation. It is likely that influences on complications and reoperations are multifactorial and cannot be attributed solely to the method of testicular fixation. Adoption of a standardised approach to emergency fixation of testes within or across institutions may be a potential avenue for future studies.
METHODS: A review of all emergency scrotal explorations performed in children under the age of 18 between 2008 and 2018 in a tertiary Paediatric Surgery unit was undertaken. Patients were categorised by initial fixation method, chi squared analysis was used to compare complication and reoperation rates.
RESULTS: 522 boys were taken to theatre, 424 had a unilateral procedure and 98 had bilateral; after 35 orchidectomies, 585 testes were left in situ. The most frequent diagnosis at operation was torted testicular appendage (n = 278, 53%), followed by testicular torsion (n = 79, 15%). The number of testes by category of fixation were: 72 no documented fixation, 130 dartos pouch only, 34 absorbable sutures, 346 non-absorbable sutures and 3 unspecified sutures. There was no difference in the reattendance rate between groups after outliers were removed (p = 0.72). Thirty-seven patients experienced complications, most commonly ongoing pain. Nine patients required an ipsilateral reoperation, 25 underwent a contralateral operation at a later date. The complication rate appeared to be higher in the no fixation group compared to the dartos (p = 0.02) and sutured groups (p = 0.048). Testes in the no fixation group had a higher reoperation rate compared to the sutured group (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is a detailed analysis of a wide variety of emergency testicular fixation methods in a large cohort, including the routine fixation of non-torted testes. Whilst there appears to be a benefit to using sutured or dartos fixation, this merits cautious interpretation. It is likely that influences on complications and reoperations are multifactorial and cannot be attributed solely to the method of testicular fixation. Adoption of a standardised approach to emergency fixation of testes within or across institutions may be a potential avenue for future studies.