MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3917/spub.263.0075

Медицинская библиотека · Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France) · 2026

[Not Available].

Hascoet Delphine, M'bwang-Seppoh Ruth, Inizan Pascal

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to analyze the coding practices of female genital mutilation (FGM) within the French Program for Medical Information Systems (PMSI) in order to identify current limitations and their impact on care classification and healthcare funding.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a qualitative analysis based on a semi-structured interview with a specialist physician and an exploratory quantitative analysis based on a questionnaire distributed to Medical Information Departments (DIM). Data analysis relied on descriptive and comparative methods.

RESULTS

All surveyed Medical Information Departments use the ICD-10 code N90.8 to code FGM as the principal diagnosis. However, practices vary significantly regarding associated diagnoses and surgical procedures. The lack of harmonization in coding practices, as well as limited awareness of specific funding mechanisms, restricts access to dedicated financial support for FGM management.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the urgent need to improve FGM coding within the PMSI through the adoption of more specific codes. Better data structuring and traceability would improve recognition of care needs and facilitate access to funding mechanisms such as MIGAC and MERRI, thereby enhancing the quality of care provided to patients.

Для цитирования: Hascoet Delphine, M'bwang-Seppoh Ruth, Inizan Pascal. [Not Available].. Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France). 2026. DOI: 10.3917/spub.263.0075.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.