Indian journal of pediatrics · 2010
Clinical profile of somatoform disorders in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gupta Vineeta, Singh Aparna, Upadhyay Shashi, Bhatia Baldev
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical profile, socio-demographic features, psychosocial stressors and outcome of somatoform disorders in children
METHODS: Children up to the age of 18 year presenting with unexplained physical symptoms over a period of 6 months were evaluated. A detailed history and physical examination was carried out. Appropriate investigations were undertaken to exclude organic causes. Diagnosis was made according to DSM-IV-TR criteria.
RESULTS: Forty-five children were diagnosed with somatoform disorders during the study period. The prevalence was 0.5% and 0.9% among outdoor and indoor patients, respectively. Conversion disorder (48.9%) was the commonest followed by other somatoform disorders (26.7%). Pseudoseizures and fainting attacks in conversion disorder and pain abdomen and general body pain in somatoform disorder were the commonest symptoms. Male to female ratio was 2.2:1. Urban children (25) were represented more than rural children (20). Stress factors were identified in 71.1% patients, which included fear of school or examinations. Thirty-three patients (73.3%) remained asymptomatic after counseling whereas, 8 patients (17.6%) had relapse requiring further counseling. Four patients (8.8%) showed no improvement and needed psychiatric evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Early referral to mental health professional is required to avoid unnecessary investigations and delay in diagnosis of somatoform disorders in children.
METHODS: Children up to the age of 18 year presenting with unexplained physical symptoms over a period of 6 months were evaluated. A detailed history and physical examination was carried out. Appropriate investigations were undertaken to exclude organic causes. Diagnosis was made according to DSM-IV-TR criteria.
RESULTS: Forty-five children were diagnosed with somatoform disorders during the study period. The prevalence was 0.5% and 0.9% among outdoor and indoor patients, respectively. Conversion disorder (48.9%) was the commonest followed by other somatoform disorders (26.7%). Pseudoseizures and fainting attacks in conversion disorder and pain abdomen and general body pain in somatoform disorder were the commonest symptoms. Male to female ratio was 2.2:1. Urban children (25) were represented more than rural children (20). Stress factors were identified in 71.1% patients, which included fear of school or examinations. Thirty-three patients (73.3%) remained asymptomatic after counseling whereas, 8 patients (17.6%) had relapse requiring further counseling. Four patients (8.8%) showed no improvement and needed psychiatric evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Early referral to mental health professional is required to avoid unnecessary investigations and delay in diagnosis of somatoform disorders in children.