International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2013
A population-based study of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for cervical screening in rural Nigeria.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ajenifuja Kayode Olusegun, Gage Julia C, Adepiti Akinfolarin C, Wentzensen Nicolas, Eklund Claire, Reilly Mary, Hutchinson Martha, Burk Robert D, Schiffman Mark
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) was introduced to screen for cervical premalignant lesions in developing countries owing to the inability of many countries to implement high-quality cytologic services. We sought to compare VIA performance among different health workers in Nigeria.
METHODS: In a population-based project, 7 health workers who had been screening women with VIA for approximately 2 years at local government health centers in rural Nigeria were retrained in a 2-week program using the International Agency for Research on Cancer training manual. Women from a rural village who had never had cervical cancer screening were recruited into the study. Each woman had cervical cancer screening by VIA, liquid-based cytologic test, and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test.
RESULTS: Despite similar participant characteristics, across all age groups, providers had wide ranges of VIA results; 0% to 21% suspect cancer and 0% to 25% were VIA positive. Visual inspection with acetic acid was insensitive compared to a combination of cytologic and HPV tests.
CONCLUSION: In our study, VIA was not reproducible, nor was it sensitive compared to cytologic and HPV tests.
METHODS: In a population-based project, 7 health workers who had been screening women with VIA for approximately 2 years at local government health centers in rural Nigeria were retrained in a 2-week program using the International Agency for Research on Cancer training manual. Women from a rural village who had never had cervical cancer screening were recruited into the study. Each woman had cervical cancer screening by VIA, liquid-based cytologic test, and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test.
RESULTS: Despite similar participant characteristics, across all age groups, providers had wide ranges of VIA results; 0% to 21% suspect cancer and 0% to 25% were VIA positive. Visual inspection with acetic acid was insensitive compared to a combination of cytologic and HPV tests.
CONCLUSION: In our study, VIA was not reproducible, nor was it sensitive compared to cytologic and HPV tests.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acetic AcidAdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNigeriaPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPrevalencePrognosisRisk FactorsRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultUterine Cervical Dysplasia