Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2016
Diagnostic Challenges in Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascular Membranes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bansal Reema, Bansal Pooja, Gupta Amod, Gupta Vishali, Dogra Mangat R, Singh Ramandeep, Katoch Deeksha
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentations of inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVMs) and factors leading to their delayed diagnosis.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of chart records and digital images of 60 patients (73 eyes) with inflammatory CNVM (January 1998 to December 2013) to obtain demographic and clinical details, particularly the time of the first documentation of inflammatory CNVM by the uveitis specialist, time of its actual appearance on digital images, and the earliest clinical indicators of a CNVM.
RESULTS: In total, 14 (19.2%) eyes had a delayed diagnosis of inflammatory CNVMs, of which five developed significant visual loss. The earliest clinical indicators of CNVM that were overlooked initially due to their subtle appearance, included a tiny subretinal hemorrhage (five eyes), peripapillary halo/fluid/scar (eight eyes), and a subfoveal scar (one eye). The causes of uveitis in these eyes included Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (five eyes, 35.7%), tubercular uveitis (five eyes, 35.7%), idiopathic (three eyes, 21.4%), and sympathetic ophthalmia (one eye, 7.1%). Presence of significant background fundus scarring, sunset glow fundus, visually significant cataract, poorly dilating pupil, media haze due to vitritis, cystoid macular edema, and multiple chorioretinal scars in these eyes probably predisposed to delayed detection of an underlying CNVM.
CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion and comparison of serial fundus photographs to identify the earliest clues of inflammatory CNVMs are important to prevent diagnostic delays and poorer outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of chart records and digital images of 60 patients (73 eyes) with inflammatory CNVM (January 1998 to December 2013) to obtain demographic and clinical details, particularly the time of the first documentation of inflammatory CNVM by the uveitis specialist, time of its actual appearance on digital images, and the earliest clinical indicators of a CNVM.
RESULTS: In total, 14 (19.2%) eyes had a delayed diagnosis of inflammatory CNVMs, of which five developed significant visual loss. The earliest clinical indicators of CNVM that were overlooked initially due to their subtle appearance, included a tiny subretinal hemorrhage (five eyes), peripapillary halo/fluid/scar (eight eyes), and a subfoveal scar (one eye). The causes of uveitis in these eyes included Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (five eyes, 35.7%), tubercular uveitis (five eyes, 35.7%), idiopathic (three eyes, 21.4%), and sympathetic ophthalmia (one eye, 7.1%). Presence of significant background fundus scarring, sunset glow fundus, visually significant cataract, poorly dilating pupil, media haze due to vitritis, cystoid macular edema, and multiple chorioretinal scars in these eyes probably predisposed to delayed detection of an underlying CNVM.
CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion and comparison of serial fundus photographs to identify the earliest clues of inflammatory CNVMs are important to prevent diagnostic delays and poorer outcomes.