Seizure · 2023
How valid are proxy assessment of mental health and sleep comorbidities of patients with epilepsy using standardized questionnaires?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Serrand Chris, Faucanié Marie, Jaussent Audrey, Crespel Arielle, Denuelle Marie, Bartolomei Fabrice, Vercueil Laurent, Derambure Philippe, Tyvaert Louise, Marchal Cécile, Landre Elisabeth, Szurhaj William, Mura Thibault, Navarro Vincent, Rheims Sylvain, Picot Marie-Christine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to determine the level of agreement between patients with epilepsy and their proxies when assessing psychiatric comorbidities, sleep disorders, and medication adherence using standardized questionnaires.
METHODS: This agreement study is an ancillary analysis of the PRERIES study, a matched case-control study exploring SUDEP risk factors. Controls aged 15 years and older, with active epilepsy or in remission for less than 5 years were recruited between 01/01/2011 and 03/31/2019. An interview was carried out by a trained psychologist on both the patient and a proxy-respondent. During these independent interviews, the following comorbidities were explored: psychiatric comorbidities using the MINI, the STAI- Y2 and NDDI-E scales, sleep disorders with the SDQ-SA and Epworth scales and medication adherence. Level of agreement between patient and their proxy was estimated using Gwet's AC1&2.
RESULTS: Among the 107 patient-proxy dyads recruited, proxy respondents were mainly family members (65.4%) or spouses (30.8%). Exploration of present major depression showed excellent agreement at 0.81 [0.65;0.97], as well as exploration of dysthymia at 0.96 [0.61;1]. Suicidal risk evaluation had a lesser agreement at 0.77 [0.60;0.94]. Agreement on anxiety was moderate 0.5 [0.38;0.62]. For sleep disorder, SDQ-SA presented a better agreement than the Epworth questionnaire with respectively 0.73 [0.51;0.95] and 0.45 [0.26;0.63]. For medication adherence, the overall agreement rate was excellent (0.90 [0.78;1]).
CONCLUSION: Exploration of potential risk factors through families can give valuable and relatively robust information, especially if the respondent lives with the patient, and should be retrieved, when possible, in usual clinical setting.
METHODS: This agreement study is an ancillary analysis of the PRERIES study, a matched case-control study exploring SUDEP risk factors. Controls aged 15 years and older, with active epilepsy or in remission for less than 5 years were recruited between 01/01/2011 and 03/31/2019. An interview was carried out by a trained psychologist on both the patient and a proxy-respondent. During these independent interviews, the following comorbidities were explored: psychiatric comorbidities using the MINI, the STAI- Y2 and NDDI-E scales, sleep disorders with the SDQ-SA and Epworth scales and medication adherence. Level of agreement between patient and their proxy was estimated using Gwet's AC1&2.
RESULTS: Among the 107 patient-proxy dyads recruited, proxy respondents were mainly family members (65.4%) or spouses (30.8%). Exploration of present major depression showed excellent agreement at 0.81 [0.65;0.97], as well as exploration of dysthymia at 0.96 [0.61;1]. Suicidal risk evaluation had a lesser agreement at 0.77 [0.60;0.94]. Agreement on anxiety was moderate 0.5 [0.38;0.62]. For sleep disorder, SDQ-SA presented a better agreement than the Epworth questionnaire with respectively 0.73 [0.51;0.95] and 0.45 [0.26;0.63]. For medication adherence, the overall agreement rate was excellent (0.90 [0.78;1]).
CONCLUSION: Exploration of potential risk factors through families can give valuable and relatively robust information, especially if the respondent lives with the patient, and should be retrieved, when possible, in usual clinical setting.