CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2018
Effects of the Dopamine Stabilizer, Pridopidine, on Basal and Phencyclidine-Induced Locomotion: Role of Dopamine D2 and Sigma-1 Receptors.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sahlholm Kristoffer, Valle-Leon Marta, Taura Jaume, Fernandez-Duenas Victor, Ciruela Francisco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pridopidine, a compound in clinical trials for Huntington's disease treatment, was originally synthesized as a dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) ligand, but later found to possess higher affinity for the sigma-1 receptor (S1R). However, the putative contributions of D2R and S1R to the behavioral profile of acutely administered pridopidine have not been investigated.
OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to compare the effects of acute pridopidine on wild-type vs. D2R and S1R knockout mice, at high (60 mg/kg) and low (6 mg/kg) doses.
METHOD: Pridopidine effects on basal and phencyclidine-induced locomotor activity was measured in the open field test. Additionally, the actions of pridopidine on prepulse inhibition was measured in animals treated with saline or phencyclidine.
RESULTS: Whereas inhibition of spontaneous and phencyclidine-induced locomotion was readily observed at 60 mg/kg pridopidine, neither locomotor stimulation in habituated mice, nor any effects on prepulse inhibition were detected upon pridopidine treatment. Surprisingly, inhibition of spontaneous locomotion was unaffected by both D2R and S1R deletion.
CONCLUSION: The present results suggest the involvement of additional targets, besides D2R and S1R, in mediating locomotor inhibition by pridopidine.
OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to compare the effects of acute pridopidine on wild-type vs. D2R and S1R knockout mice, at high (60 mg/kg) and low (6 mg/kg) doses.
METHOD: Pridopidine effects on basal and phencyclidine-induced locomotor activity was measured in the open field test. Additionally, the actions of pridopidine on prepulse inhibition was measured in animals treated with saline or phencyclidine.
RESULTS: Whereas inhibition of spontaneous and phencyclidine-induced locomotion was readily observed at 60 mg/kg pridopidine, neither locomotor stimulation in habituated mice, nor any effects on prepulse inhibition were detected upon pridopidine treatment. Surprisingly, inhibition of spontaneous locomotion was unaffected by both D2R and S1R deletion.
CONCLUSION: The present results suggest the involvement of additional targets, besides D2R and S1R, in mediating locomotor inhibition by pridopidine.