Health services research · 2026
Comparing Health Care Utilization Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare by Dementia Status: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joseph Jason M, Rachel Jennifer, Han Gang, Smith Matthew Lee
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare health care utilization between Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries, stratified by Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) status.
STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional observational analysis of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years continuously enrolled in MA or TM. Eight self- or proxy-reported binary utilization outcomes over a 12-month reference period were estimated by survey-weighted linear probability models stratified by ADRD status.
DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Secondary analysis of pooled 2018-2022 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) public use files (N = 43,995: 974 TM and 954 MA with ADRD; 23,050 TM and 19,017 MA without ADRD), excluding beneficiaries entitled through disability or end-stage renal disease and records with missing covariates. Dual-eligible beneficiaries were retained and dual eligibility included as a covariate. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights multiplied by MCBS full-sample weights addressed non-random MA enrollment.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among beneficiaries with ADRD, seven of eight adjusted MA - TM differences were not statistically significant. Specialist visits were more common among MA beneficiaries with ADRD (5.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.1 to 10.2). Among beneficiaries without ADRD, MA was associated with lower outpatient hospital visits (-2.6; -3.7 to -1.6) and lower reported need for home health visits (-0.9; -1.5 to -0.3). Effect modification by ADRD status was significant only for specialist visits (interaction 6.3 percentage points; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted health care utilization was broadly comparable between MA and TM for beneficiaries with ADRD, with the exception of higher specialist use in MA. Among beneficiaries without ADRD, MA was associated with lower outpatient hospital use. Plan-type differences were smaller and fewer for beneficiaries with ADRD.
STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional observational analysis of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years continuously enrolled in MA or TM. Eight self- or proxy-reported binary utilization outcomes over a 12-month reference period were estimated by survey-weighted linear probability models stratified by ADRD status.
DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Secondary analysis of pooled 2018-2022 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) public use files (N = 43,995: 974 TM and 954 MA with ADRD; 23,050 TM and 19,017 MA without ADRD), excluding beneficiaries entitled through disability or end-stage renal disease and records with missing covariates. Dual-eligible beneficiaries were retained and dual eligibility included as a covariate. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights multiplied by MCBS full-sample weights addressed non-random MA enrollment.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among beneficiaries with ADRD, seven of eight adjusted MA - TM differences were not statistically significant. Specialist visits were more common among MA beneficiaries with ADRD (5.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.1 to 10.2). Among beneficiaries without ADRD, MA was associated with lower outpatient hospital visits (-2.6; -3.7 to -1.6) and lower reported need for home health visits (-0.9; -1.5 to -0.3). Effect modification by ADRD status was significant only for specialist visits (interaction 6.3 percentage points; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted health care utilization was broadly comparable between MA and TM for beneficiaries with ADRD, with the exception of higher specialist use in MA. Among beneficiaries without ADRD, MA was associated with lower outpatient hospital use. Plan-type differences were smaller and fewer for beneficiaries with ADRD.