DOI 10.1186/s13019-026-04638-0
Uncovering research themes in coronary slow flow predictors: a bibliometric and cluster analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to elucidate research trends, collaborative networks, and the thematic evolution of predictors for coronary slow flow (CSF).
METHODS
Relevant literature published between 1977 and 2026 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analysis was conducted utilizing VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R 4.3.3.
RESULTS
A total of 366 articles were included, indicating an upward trend in research output. China (118 articles), Turkey (65), and the USA (35) emerged as the leading countries. Prominent institutions included China Medical University (29 articles), Capital Medical University (20), and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (14). Influential journals were Circulation (impact factor 41.3, JCR Q1), Circulation Journal (5.8, Q1), and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (3.9, Q1). The most prolific author was Wang Yong, with 12 publications and an H-index of 10. Keyword clustering identified three research themes: pathogenesis of CSF, prediction for CSF following percutaneous coronary intervention, and its prognostic implications. Emerging keywords highlighted increasing attention to "endothelial function", "prevalence", "CSF phenomenon", "myocardial infarction" and "reserve".
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a bibliometric overview of key trends and future directions in the field of CSF predictors, emphasizing the growing focus on this area. Future research is anticipated to concentrate on risk stratification and mechanism-targeted intervention strategies.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.