MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.29580

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2021

Paper Patching Versus Watchful Waiting of Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Meta-Analysis.

Simani Liam, Oron Yahav, Handzel Ophir, Eta Rani Abu, Warshavsky Anton, Horowitz Gilad, Muhanna Nidal, Ungar Omer J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to investigate the healing rates, the restoration of hearing, and the time for complete healing of paper patching versus watchful waiting for traumatic tympanic membrane perforations (TTMPs).

STUDY

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta analysis.

METHODS

Publications were selected by a search on "PubMed," "Embase," and "Web of Science." A meta-analysis of risk ratios for paper patching (intervention arm) and watchful waiting (control arm) was performed.

RESULTS

Five studies describing 393 TTMPs were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. TTMP healing rates ranged between 84.2% and 95.2% in the intervention arm and between 76.7% and 84.8% in the control arm. The pooled risk ratio of healed TTMPs was significantly higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm (risk ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

TTMPs have high healing potential with and without intervention. The healing rate of paper patching was superior to that of watchful waiting alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2091-2097, 2021.

Для цитирования: Simani Liam, Oron Yahav, Handzel Ophir, Eta Rani Abu, Warshavsky Anton, Horowitz Gilad, Muhanna Nidal, Ungar Omer J. Paper Patching Versus Watchful Waiting of Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Meta-Analysis.. The Laryngoscope. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/lary.29580.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.